97th-octave temperaments: Difference between revisions
oops |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) "optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.9... | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.9... | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|388, 2619, 3395}}... | |||
=== Berkelium-248 === | === Berkelium-248 === | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.945 | Optimal tuning (CTE): ~3/2 = 701.945 | ||
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1|388, 2619}}, ... | |||
=== Berkelium-247 === | === Berkelium-247 === | ||