Ed5/2: Difference between revisions
CompactStar (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
CompactStar (talk | contribs) This whole thing doesn't work because having good 5/4 means having good 2/1 |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Incidentally, one way to treat 5/2 as an equivalence is the use of the 2:3:4:(5) chord as the fundamental complete sonority in a very similar way to the 3:4:5:(6) chord in meantone. Whereas in meantone it takes three 4/3 to get to 6/5, here it takes three 3/2 to get to 6/5 (tempering out the comma 3125/3048). So, doing this yields 5, 7, and 12 note MOS, just like meantone. While the notes are rather closer together, the scheme is exactly identical to meantone. "Macrodiatonic" might be a perfect term for it because it uses a scheme that turns out exactly identical to meantone, though severely stretched. | Incidentally, one way to treat 5/2 as an equivalence is the use of the 2:3:4:(5) chord as the fundamental complete sonority in a very similar way to the 3:4:5:(6) chord in meantone. Whereas in meantone it takes three 4/3 to get to 6/5, here it takes three 3/2 to get to 6/5 (tempering out the comma 3125/3048). So, doing this yields 5, 7, and 12 note MOS, just like meantone. While the notes are rather closer together, the scheme is exactly identical to meantone. "Macrodiatonic" might be a perfect term for it because it uses a scheme that turns out exactly identical to meantone, though severely stretched. | ||
== Individual pages for ED5/2s == | == Individual pages for ED5/2s == | ||
* [[5ed5/2]] | * [[5ed5/2]] | ||