Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
: Since there are no category-related conventions so far, to my knowledge, I tried to get this as coherent as possible by looking at the existing stuff, but it's still a work in progress. For instance, I don't know much about step-nested scales, but if it turns out that they are always tempered, then that could become a subcategory of tempered scales. But then I like the idea of having every tempered scales categorized straight in [[:Category:Tempered scales]] as well anyway, since I think that conveys the information more clearly, although that's certainly debatable. Also, some scales are described as "haplotonic", "albitonic" or "chromatic" with relation to [[chromatic pairs]], and I'm not sure yet how to treat these categories, so I usually stash them near the end when I don't just forget about them at all.
: Since there are no category-related conventions so far, to my knowledge, I tried to get this as coherent as possible by looking at the existing stuff, but it's still a work in progress. For instance, I don't know much about step-nested scales, but if it turns out that they are always tempered, then that could become a subcategory of tempered scales. But then I like the idea of having every tempered scales categorized straight in [[:Category:Tempered scales]] as well anyway, since I think that conveys the information more clearly, although that's certainly debatable. Also, some scales are described as "haplotonic", "albitonic" or "chromatic" with relation to [[chromatic pairs]], and I'm not sure yet how to treat these categories, so I usually stash them near the end when I don't just forget about them at all.
: Anyway, I'm willing to discuss about this sort of conventions, so if you have anything to pitch in, I'd like to hear your point of view. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 18:35, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
: Anyway, I'm willing to discuss about this sort of conventions, so if you have anything to pitch in, I'd like to hear your point of view. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 18:35, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
:: '''Thanks''' so much for the clarification, also '''for all the housekeeping work''' of course. The tiny part I totally missed is the change from ''Category:Tempered scale'' to ''Category:Tempered scale'''s'''''. BTW, I think it could be better to leave the old variants to mark them as deprecated and point to the category to use instead (→ [[:Category:Deprecated categories]]); this is because categories don't have a useful redirect equivalent. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 05:49, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
::: The above-mentioned category (meanwhile renamed to [[:category:step-nested scales]]) is now deleted. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 13:26, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
== Related bot account ==
I added [[User:Fredg999 category edits]] to groups <code>bot</code> and <code>autopatrolled</code>. Best regards --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 18:37, 19 February 2022 (UTC)