Talk:MOS naming: Difference between revisions
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:: I do find "enlarged" and "reduced" appealing. Maybe "generating" can be used instead of "perfect". This would eliminate any need for a ''mos-'' prefix. | :: I do find "enlarged" and "reduced" appealing. Maybe "generating" can be used instead of "perfect". This would eliminate any need for a ''mos-'' prefix. | ||
:: The & and @ are supposed to be accidentals that are readable on a staff (when stylized) and distinct enough. [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 17:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC) | :: The & and @ are supposed to be accidentals that are readable on a staff (when stylized) and distinct enough. [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 17:31, 13 April 2021 (UTC) | ||
::: Thinking in terms of potential translations to other languages, and economizing on the syllables, maybe ''real/true'', ''general'', or just use ''gen'' itself as a word. | |||
::: On &/@ - that may be so, but so are +/- and Unicode support for stylizing inline text isn't coming anytime soon. I would strongly suggest A+/B- or */` (A*/`B). [[User:Ayceman|Ayceman]] ([[User talk:Ayceman|talk]]) 18:03, 13 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
::: I'll add that the prefixes should probably stay, as they could be used for the traditional harmonic system (#/b/maj/min/aug/dim/perf), maybe call that THARMS [[User:Ayceman|Ayceman]] ([[User talk:Ayceman|talk]]) 19:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
Suggested compromise: | |||
* Generator: ''perfect'' (e.g. perfect mos4th, Pmos4) | |||
* Smaller interval class (when not the generator's): ''small'' (e.g. small mos3rd, smos3) | |||
* Larger interval class (when not the generator's): ''large'' (e.g. large mos3rd, Lmos3) | |||
* "small" minus chroma or "perfect" minus chroma: ''diminished'' (e.g. diminished mos3rd, dmos3) | |||
* "large" plus chroma or "perfect" plus chroma: ''augmented'' (e.g. augmented mos3rd, Amos3) | |||
[[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 22:44, 13 April 2021 (UTC) | |||
: Hmm, there's still a potential issue in confusing aug and dim if you use an inverted harmonic system. I was thinking of making an interval table in sephiroid displaying both TAMNAMS and the inverted traditional intervals, as proposed by Komorsky. At present, it would map a diminished to an augmented and vice-versa. Enlarged 3rd (E3), large 3rd (L3), small 3rd (s3), reduced 3rd (r3) should work to distinguish them. [[User:Ayceman|Ayceman]] ([[User talk:Ayceman|talk]]) 23:04, 13 April 2021 (UTC) |