Talk:Mason Green's New Common Practice Notation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 228: | Line 228: | ||
: Bozu, as a quick note, I would say this should be moved to "Mason Green's 19-EDO notation," or whatever, and then this page should be edited however you see fit. I share your view there are some issues with the existing notation as written - having the augmented second be "bIII," for instance, totally breaks the pattern in 19-EDO... [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 16:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC) | : Bozu, as a quick note, I would say this should be moved to "Mason Green's 19-EDO notation," or whatever, and then this page should be edited however you see fit. I share your view there are some issues with the existing notation as written - having the augmented second be "bIII," for instance, totally breaks the pattern in 19-EDO... [[User:Mike Battaglia|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia|talk]]) 16:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC) | ||
: Thanks Mike! I moved the page, as you can see, if you are reading this. I'll make a few edits, but I'll try not to mess this up any worse. --[[User:Bozu|Bozu]] ([[User talk:Bozu|talk]]) 18:55, 2 May 2019 (UTC) |