Talk:Miscellaneous 5-limit temperaments: Difference between revisions
WikispacesArchive>Mike Battaglia m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''... |
Re |
||
| (12 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WSArchiveLink}} | {{WSArchiveLink}} | ||
== Rename == | |||
This page is just a giant dumping ground for bad 5-limit temperaments. Shouldn't we just make new family pages for these, instead of dumping all the 5-limit stuff here and all the 7-limit and higher extensions onto "<7-limit comma> temperaments"? It doesn't make much sense giving the 7-limit extension under 7-limit collections instead of the actual 5-limit temp's family (for example Diesic under [[Orwellismic temperaments]] rather than creating "Dieisic family"), and it will make this page much less cluttered. This would be quite like if 5-limit meantone was placed on a page which was jumbled up with unrelated 5-limit temperaments, septimal meantone was placed on [[starling temperaments]], flattone in [[keemic temperaments]], and dominant in [[mint temperaments]]. [[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 16:40, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
I can understand if the reason is that making all the family pages would flood the wiki, but this should be renamed to something like "miscellaneous 5-limit temperaments" if it's more for that than specifically very high badness temperaments. [[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 16:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
: Making families for all these temperaments certainly doesn't make sense. Your last point looks most reasonable to me. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 02:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Alphabetical order == | |||
Temperaments in this page used to be sorted by badness. Is the alphabetical order more desirable? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 12:09, 6 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
: The page may need to have a big loud message box at the top saying to sort the temperaments in order of badness. | |||
: Otherwise some editors won’t spot that the temperaments are ordered that way, as it may be easy to miss if you’re not looking for it. | |||
: They might put temperaments in the wrong order not out of opposition to the system, but simply out of not even noticing that there is a system. | |||
: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 12:51, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:: Sure. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 14:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC) | |||