Talk:Schismic–commatic equivalence continuum: Difference between revisions
m FloraC moved page Talk:Schismic–Pythagorean equivalence continuum to Talk:Schismic–commatic equivalence continuum: Pythagorean is assumed so it conveys nothing. This is the continuum of the Pythagorean comma, so *commatic* is the word to use here. |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:: Oops, typo. You're right -- I meant to put Syntonic-Schismic or Schismic-Syntonic. Fixing this in the title and in my original comment. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 19:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC) | :: Oops, typo. You're right -- I meant to put Syntonic-Schismic or Schismic-Syntonic. Fixing this in the title and in my original comment. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 19:16, 30 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
== 5-limit gracecordial == | |||
This restriction should not be canonical as both 113 & 125 and 149 & 161 are viable extensions and the optimum is around 137edo. Now there are "biscordial" and "triscordial" (idk why the ''s''), I think the restriction of gracecordial can be called ''monocordial''. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 12:08, 24 April 2026 (UTC) | |||