Regular temperament

This is a beginner page. It is written to allow new readers to learn about the basics of the topic easily. The corresponding expert page for this topic is Mathematical theory of regular temperaments.

English Wikipedia has an article on:

Regular temperament

A regular temperament (RT) is an abstract tuning system that looks the same no matter which pitch you start from (or consider the tonic). In other words, unlimited free modulation is possible: any interval can be stacked as many times as you like. A regular temperament is generated by a set of generating intervals (usually one of which is considered the period), and any note that can be reached by stacking any number of these generating intervals is considered to be part of the regular temperament. Regular temperaments generally have an infinite number of notes; and other than equal temperaments, every regular temperament actually has an infinite number of notes in between any two other notes.

In addition to unlimited modulation, regular temperaments by definition are thought of as being approximations of some more complicated system of pure or target intervals, very often a just intonation (JI) subgroup. Each abstract interval is interpreted as a tempered, or detuned, version of the target interval (more accurately, a set of target intervals). A temperament only qualifies as a regular temperament if this interpretation works in a perfectly consistent way: the sum of two tempered intervals must always be the tempered version of the sum of the JI intervals. Multiple pure intervals may be represented by the same tempered interval (so they are tempered together), but a single pure interval must never be represented by different tempered intervals. Certain intervals are tempered to the unison; in a regular temperament, these intervals are known as commas. Any two just intervals seperated by a comma of a temperament are mapped to the same tempered interval in that temperament. For example, meantone temperament, the 5-limit temperament tempering out 81/80, maps 81/64 and 5/4 to the same interval, as 81/64 and 5/4 differ by 81/80 in JI.

One particularly simple kind of regular temperaments is equal temperaments, which represent all intervals by multiples of a single smallest step. At the other extreme, JI itself can be considered a trivial temperament where no tempering is happening: no commas are tempered out, but all are preserved as small pitch differences. Another example of a trivial temperament is single-pitch tuning, where there are no generating intervals, and there is only a single pitch. In between lies the cornucopia of temperaments discussed in Paul Erlich's seminal work, A Middle Path Between Just Intonation and the Equal Temperaments.

History

The roots of regular temperament theory (RTT) can be traced back for centuries. The practice far predates the theory, and in particular meantone temperament has been known since the 15th century. Many early pioneers set the stage for the general theory to come:

• Nicola Vicentino (1511–1576): adaptive JI, 31et
• Leonhard Euler (1707–1783): 5-limit tonespace
• Hermann von Helmholtz (1821–1894): psychoacoustics
• R. H. M. Bosanquet (1841–1913): regular mapping, generalized keyboard
• Shohe Tanaka (1862–1945): 5-limit tonespace (triangular projection)
• Adriaan Fokker (1887–1972): periodicity blocks
• Harry Partch (1901–1974): extended JI
• Erv Wilson (1928–2016): extended tonespace (and projections), mos, scale tree
• Easley Blackwood (1933–2023): Blackwood[10], syntonic comma vanishing relation as equation
• George Secor (1943–2020): miracle temperament

A significant amount of this theory's early development occurred online via the Yahoo! Groups service. The groundwork was laid by Paul Erlich, Graham Breed, Dave Keenan, Herman Miller, and Paul Hahn in the late 1990's.

In 2001 Gene Ward Smith joined Yahoo! Groups and immediately began making major contributions to the conversation, introducing new terminology and higher-level math. He and his closer collaborators such as Mike Battaglia also did much of the work to document RTT on this wiki.

In 2009 Kite Giedraitis began developing his own approach to RTT, including some noteworthy innovations.

FAQ

Why would I want to use a regular temperament?

Regular temperaments are of most use to musicians who want their music to sound as much as possible like stacking-based just intonation, but without the difficulties normally associated with it, such as wolf intervals, commas, and comma pumps. Specifically, if your chord progression pumps a comma, and you want to avoid pitch shifts, wolf intervals, and/or tonic drift, that comma must be tempered out. Temperaments are also of interest to musicians wishing to exploit the unique possibilities that arise when ratios that are distinct in JI become equated. For instance, 10/9 and 9/8 are equated in meantone. Equating distinct ratios through temperament allows for the construction of musical "puns", which are melodies or chord progressions that exploit the multiplicity of "meanings" of tempered intervals. Finally, some use temperaments solely for their sound. For example, one might like the sound of neutral thirds, without caring much what ratio they are tuned to. Thus one might use rastmic even though no commas are pumped.

How does regular temperament theory help me compose music?

The skill of music composition is acquired by studying the disciplines such as harmony, form, orchestration, in addition to extensive listening. One common misconception is that learning regular temperament theory can be a substitute for any of those. Regular temperament theory does indeed present you with numerous tuning systems, and provide the tools to help you compare and choose between them based on some common goals. It also tells you how harmonic resources are available in each tuning system, though the question of putting them together to a piece of work is really up to you to experiment with. In other words, one may think of the relationship between regular temperament theory and composition as this: regular temperament theory tells you how to choose a tuning, while composition regards how to use a chosen tuning.

What do I need to know to understand all the numbers on the pages for individual regular temperaments?

Although the concept of regular temperament is centuries old and predates much of modern mathematics, members of the Yahoo! Alternative Tuning List have developed a particular form of numerical shorthand for describing the properties of temperaments. The most important of these are vals (mappings), monzos and tempering out commas, which any student of the modern regular temperament paradigm should become familiar with. These concepts are rather straightforward and require little math to understand.

The rank of a temperament is its dimension. It equals the number of generators in the subgroup being used minus the number of independent commas that are tempered out.

Another recent contribution to the field of temperament is the concept of optimization, which can take many forms. The point of optimization is to minimize the difference between a temperament and JI by finding an optimal tuning for the generator. The most frequently used forms of optimization are POTE ("Pure-Octave Tenney–Euclidean"), TOP ("Tenney OPtimal", or "Tempered Octaves, Please") and more recently CWE ("Constained Weil–Euclidean"), which has become the new standard instead of POTE since POTE is meant to be an approximation. Optimization is rather intensive mathematically, but it is seldom left as an exercise to the reader; most temperaments are presented here in their optimal forms in terms of POTE and CTE generators. In addition, for each temperament there is a sequence of equal temperaments showing possible equal-step tunings in the order of better absolute accuracy to JI.

The most common browser tools used for finding optimal tunings (useful for investigating new temperaments) are Graham Breed's Temperament Finder and Sintel's Temperament Calculator; the former gives temperament names (usually consistent with the wiki) and implements a wide variety of features like finding related temperaments while the latter implements CWE and more complex types of subgroups (like allowing ratios as generators) and supports an alternative notation to warts that is more convenient for arbitrary subgroups.

Usually, temperaments have names coming from a wide array of sources, but they can also have systematic and rigorous names, from which the comma(s) can be deduced. The most common systematic temperament naming system on the wiki is Kite's color notation: wa = 3-limit, yo = 5-over, gu = 5-under, zo = 7-over, and ru = 7-under (see also Kite's color notation/Temperament names).

Yet another recent development is the concept of a pergen, appearing in our Tour of regular temperaments as (P8, P5/2) or somesuch, which classifies temperaments by their period and the generator(s), giving ideas of how to notate these temperaments. For rank-2 temperaments we have developed a similar classification system called ploidacot.

Further reading

Introductory materials

• A Middle Path: this is Paul Erlich's guide to RTT (regular temperament theory)
• Dave Keenan & Douglas Blumeyer's guide to RTT
• Keenan Pepper's explanation of vals

Key regular temperament concepts

These topics are covered in the introductory materials above, but you can read about them here in more depth:

• Monzo
• Val
• Mapping
• Comma basis
• Patent val
• Tempering out
• Rank and codimension
• Tuning map

Lists of temperaments

Temperaments that approximate important harmonies relatively well with a small number of notes:

• Low harmonic entropy linear temperaments
• Middle Path table of 5-limit rank-2 temperaments
• Middle Path table of 7-limit rank-2 temperaments
• Middle Path table of 11-limit rank-2 temperaments

More comprehensive lists:

• Bird's eye view of temperaments by accuracy (article): temperaments the Xen Wiki contributors find most useful for approximating JI - with edo tunings and note counts for the harmonies they target, and explanations of their structure
• Survey of efficient temperaments by subgroup (table): good general-purpose temperaments, sorted by size (notes per equave) and by JI subgroup
• Map of rank-2 temperaments (table): temperaments (some general, some niche) sorted by the size of their period and generator
• Temperaments for MOS shapes (table): temperaments (some general, some niche) sorted by the scale shape they generate
• Tour of regular temperaments (article): huge gallery of the dozens of families of temperaments that have been described; very technical - not for the faint of heart

Other writings on temperaments

• Mike Battaglia's lectures on RTT

External links

• Graham Breed's "The Regular Mapping Paradigm"
• John Moriarty – Tuning Theory 2: Temperament ("Microtonal" Theory), a video lecture