39ed9: Difference between revisions
Dummy index (talk | contribs) I don't think it's a good idea to consider 9 as 27/3, but even so, why is it 9th and not 3rd? |
Dummy index (talk | contribs) another explanation |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox ET}} | {{Infobox ET}} | ||
Similar to [[97.5cET]], 39ed9 divides the double tritave, [[9/1]], into 39 equal steps of approximately 97.5362c. It stands out as a 4/3.5/3.7/3.11/3.13/3 | Similar to [[97.5cET]], 39ed9 divides the double tritave, [[9/1]], into 39 equal steps of approximately 97.5362c. It stands out as a 9.4/3.5/3.7/3.11/3.13/3 [[subgroup]] (and equivalently 9.12.15.21.33.39 subgroup) tuning as of the [[k*N subgroups|2*39 subgroups]] that came down from the [[39edt]]. This is a [[half-prime subgroup|third-basis subgroup]].{{idiosyncratic}} | ||
== Intervals == | == Intervals == | ||