Talk:2901533edo: Difference between revisions
Created page with "Sorry about the mess, I heard this EDO was the next mega-performer after 311, so I wanted to create this article and see what the infoboxes revealed- except, they didn't funct..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Sorry about the mess, I heard this EDO was the next mega-performer after 311, so I wanted to create this article and see what the infoboxes revealed- except, they didn't function like they were supposed to. Sorry about that... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:27, 9 May 2023 (UTC) | Sorry about the mess, I heard this EDO was the next mega-performer after 311, so I wanted to create this article and see what the infoboxes revealed- except, they didn't function like they were supposed to. Sorry about that... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 23:27, 9 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
== Many issues on this page == | |||
This page is heavily biased, and has poor readability. For example, it draws the readers' attention to the 137-limit no-247 255-odd-limit as well as many other arbitrary interval sets, which obfuscates the basic facts and actively makes it more difficult to understand. 131-odd-limit is the clear, hence preferred presentation here. It also reads "[it being a candidate for 'miracle edo'] is not entirely certain or clear because a deep exhaustive search of comprehensive odd-limit performance has not been done up until this point", but that's not true as its unusual consistency at its size range is sufficient and adequately noted. Then odd prime sum limit is mentioned, which again isn't very notable. I don't think it's reasonable to assume an edo user have learned, or to ask them to learn this concept. All these problematic contents should just be removed. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:59, 24 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 15:59, 24 March 2026
Sorry about the mess, I heard this EDO was the next mega-performer after 311, so I wanted to create this article and see what the infoboxes revealed- except, they didn't function like they were supposed to. Sorry about that... --Aura (talk) 23:27, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Many issues on this page
This page is heavily biased, and has poor readability. For example, it draws the readers' attention to the 137-limit no-247 255-odd-limit as well as many other arbitrary interval sets, which obfuscates the basic facts and actively makes it more difficult to understand. 131-odd-limit is the clear, hence preferred presentation here. It also reads "[it being a candidate for 'miracle edo'] is not entirely certain or clear because a deep exhaustive search of comprehensive odd-limit performance has not been done up until this point", but that's not true as its unusual consistency at its size range is sufficient and adequately noted. Then odd prime sum limit is mentioned, which again isn't very notable. I don't think it's reasonable to assume an edo user have learned, or to ask them to learn this concept. All these problematic contents should just be removed. —FloraC (talk) 15:59, 24 March 2026 (UTC)