Template talk:Primes in edo fs: Difference between revisions
→Differences with Template:Primes in edo: new section |
No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
As a side note, I notice a few differences between the templates; maybe the first one was updated after the fork? Anyway, I wish the second was the same as the first but with the extra line for fifthspan. I guess it doesn't really matter if that is changed later, since the tables are dynamically generated by the module anyway, but I could be mistaken about how modules work. [[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 15:53, 18 July 2021 (UTC) | As a side note, I notice a few differences between the templates; maybe the first one was updated after the fork? Anyway, I wish the second was the same as the first but with the extra line for fifthspan. I guess it doesn't really matter if that is changed later, since the tables are dynamically generated by the module anyway, but I could be mistaken about how modules work. [[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 15:53, 18 July 2021 (UTC) | ||
: The postfix <code>_fs</code> stands for ''fifthspan''. My goal is to add fifthspans to the first template (maybe as an option, maybe automatically added when it's unique). There are also a few things to adjust in formatting, so the hyphen in negative values will be replaced by the minus sign. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 06:11, 19 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
:: That's what I guessed for <code>_fs</code>. Automatic fifthspan for single-ring edos would be fantastic, but no pressure! In the meanwhile, I'll use the regular template when needed, but I won't replace the tables that include the fifthspans for now. [[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 16:18, 19 July 2021 (UTC) |