Talk:Octave reduction: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Introduction: reword |
→Introduction: +1 |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Introduction == | == Introduction == | ||
I don't think that it's a good idea to start from the ''generalized perspective''. I'm especially confused by the fact that [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Octave_reduction&type=revision&diff=74592&oldid=74275 the change] was done by Fredg999. @Fredg999 | I don't think that it's a good idea to start from the ''generalized perspective''. I'm especially confused by the fact that [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Octave_reduction&type=revision&diff=74592&oldid=74275 the change] was done by Fredg999. @Fredg999, as a teacher, you should know that if you introduce a topic in this way, you risk losing the attention of half the students already at the beginning. Would you please be so kind as to change the order to (1) octave reduction (2) generalization? Thanks. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 11:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC) | ||
: Second this. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 11:58, 18 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:58, 18 July 2021
Merge
Should merge this page with Octave-reduce -- Spt3125 (talk) 19:09, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Introduction
I don't think that it's a good idea to start from the generalized perspective. I'm especially confused by the fact that the change was done by Fredg999. @Fredg999, as a teacher, you should know that if you introduce a topic in this way, you risk losing the attention of half the students already at the beginning. Would you please be so kind as to change the order to (1) octave reduction (2) generalization? Thanks. --Xenwolf (talk) 11:29, 18 July 2021 (UTC)