User talk:Arseniiv/Factorization: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→numbers as names: regex-sample... |
re |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::: Please have a look on [[SandBox#Testing factor notation]], only unsolved problem here is the trailing dot. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | ::: Please have a look on [[SandBox#Testing factor notation]], only unsolved problem here is the trailing dot. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::: Looks good! Though maybe also alternatively use <code>^</code> for powers? | |||
Revision as of 21:28, 7 November 2020
numbers as names
I'd try pseudo-positionals in this case. I already found out that you can write {{some template|1=value containing the '=' character}} if you have positional parameters with alternative names. This should also work if we ignore 1, 4, 6, 8, 9 and so on. What do you think? --Xenwolf (talk) 20:52, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- O, sorry, I see: not possible because of the 16-parameter limit. --Xenwolf (talk) 20:54, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- Maybe prefixes instead? We could use the regex extension, see Template:EDOs for an example. --Xenwolf (talk) 20:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- Please have a look on SandBox#Testing factor notation, only unsolved problem here is the trailing dot. --Xenwolf (talk) 21:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- Looks good! Though maybe also alternatively use
^for powers?
- Looks good! Though maybe also alternatively use