Talk:0edo: Difference between revisions

Mike Battaglia (talk | contribs)
m Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
{{WSArchiveLink}}
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''


<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.
== Every drum solo? ==


----
I'm not sure about [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=0edo&type=revision&diff=74960&oldid=70685 Cryptovolans] as music example for 0edo. But let's wait for better ones... --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 06:19, 24 July 2021 (UTC)


== 1/0 undefined/infinite ==
== Merge with "Single-pitch tuning" ==
I certainly am no mathematician but changing "standard mathematics" to "kid's mathematics" doesn't seem helpful and I based that definition on various sources online (including Wikipedia which gave a fairly nuanced discussion on the topic). And then the further explanation that 1/0 = infinity and therefore there would only be one sound is basically the reasoning used in the next paragraph which uses limits. If there's a better way to phrase it that would be great. If we should just get rid of that paragraph and tell people that the only way to think about 0edo is that it would be one note then that's a possibility.


- '''davethecomposer''' September 02, 2016, 06:34:40 PM UTC-0700
The info on this page is also present on the page for "Single-pitch tuning", which compiles various approaches to the "0edo" concept, including Om temperament and 0edo.
----
Amen 0-EDD, supreme !!!
 
:D
 
- '''Osmiorisbendi''' April 14, 2017, 12:23:55 AM UTC-0700
----
Return to "0edo" page.