|
|
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| = ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
| | {{WSArchiveLink}} |
| '''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
| |
|
| |
|
| <span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.
| | == Please check mapping of 9-limit intervals == |
| | Someone private messaged me on Facebook because I'm a wiki editor, but I didn't feel confident dealing with the thing they talked about so I'm posting it here so someone more confident and experienced can deal with it: |
|
| |
|
| ---- | | "The wiki page for 11EDO might need brushing up in regards to consistency, since it keeps referring to the "correct" 9-limit intervals, but the listed val in 3-limit cannot produce those 🤔 Because the 3rd harmonic is so flat, it would put 9/8 at 1\11 edosteps, but the page keeps referring it to 2\11." |
|
| |
|
| == A modest suggerence for 11-EDD notation ==
| | : I don't really see the issue. Mapping 9/8 to 1\11 seems absurd, and the interval table does state that it's based on the 2.9 subgroup and not 2.3. |
| Is possible that i put a notation based on the MOSscale 222221, like this:
| | : Maybe the confusion is because in the regular temperament properties the full 13-limit [11 17 26 31 38 41] is assumed (which is questionable for sure). |
| | | : – [[User:Sintel|<span style="color:#965d99">Sintel</span>🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel|talk]]) 22:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC) |
| Cent-Name-Step
| |
| | |
| 0 - Q - 0
| |
| | |
| 109 - Q# - 1
| |
| | |
| 218 - R - 2
| |
| | |
| 327 - R# - 3
| |
| | |
| 436 - S - 4
| |
| | |
| 545 - S# - 5
| |
| | |
| 655 - T - 6
| |
| | |
| 764 - T# - 7
| |
| | |
| 873 - U - 8
| |
| | |
| 982 - U# - 9
| |
| | |
| 1091 - P\Qb - 10
| |
| | |
| 1200 - Q\P# - 11\0
| |
| | |
| The letters are P, Q, R, S, T and U.
| |
| | |
| Greetings \\\'\\\\'
| |
| | |
| - '''Osmiorisbendi''' November 19, 2011, 09:25:31 PM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |
| Sure, that's based around machine[6]. Although I'd suggest the 221222 mode as base, though...
| |
| | |
| - '''mbattaglia1''' November 19, 2011, 09:56:02 PM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |
| Thanks, Mike. So, the MOSscale 5L1s is called Machine?
| |
| | |
| Ok (;
| |
| | |
| - '''Osmiorisbendi''' November 20, 2011, 09:08:03 PM UTC-0800
| |
| ----
| |
| | |
| == Dan Stearns? ==
| |
| Works by Dan Stearns have been repeatedly inserted and deleted again. Why that?
| |
| | |
| - '''hstraub''' April 08, 2008, 01:30:03 AM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| Who did the deleting?
| |
| | |
| - '''genewardsmith''' March 28, 2011, 10:47:17 PM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| The deleting was always done by a guest. But it seems that the link target istn't available any more.
| |
| | |
| - '''xenwolf''' March 28, 2011, 11:56:28 PM UTC-0700 | |
| ----
| |
| here I googled some infos, (links also broken)
| |
| | |
| http://www.musik-news.org/post/12124/thinking_outside_the_box...and_the_circle_of_fifths.html
| |
| | |
| but look *here* :)
| |
| | |
| http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/dan-stearns/individual-files-20100308/
| |
| | |
| - '''xenwolf''' March 29, 2011, 12:02:23 AM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| I think it was Dan Stearns himself who deleted them.
| |
| | |
| - '''hstraub''' March 29, 2011, 12:03:03 AM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| Do you know him? Doesn't he want to be listed here?
| |
| | |
| - '''xenwolf''' March 29, 2011, 12:16:33 AM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |
| I remember some e-mails I exchanged with someone who had deleted links to his music on the xenwiki, and he explicitly said he did not wanted the links. But I do not remember whether it was Dan Stearns. I will check tonight at home.
| |
| | |
| - '''hstraub''' March 29, 2011, 05:11:13 AM UTC-0700
| |
| ----
| |