User:FloraC/Quick reference

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Taxonomy of tuning approaches

  • Tuning rationalism
    • JI purism: this school recognizes that the acoustic quality of JI is of top importance. Some consider music as a platonic ideal object that cannot be approximated at all. Meanwhile, its weaker version is characterized by being maximally strict about JI approximation.
      • Primodality: I don't feel entitled to define this.
      • Stacking based a.k.a. lattice based: a more traditional approach to JI. They recognize both the acoustic quality and the algebraic structure of JI.
    • JI approximabilism: this school recognizes that the acoustic quality of JI and the algebraic structure of tuning systems are similarly important, and therefore accepts a tradeoff.
      • RTT: this school encompasses stacking based JI and applies approximation for custom structures.
    • JI agnosticism: this school suspends the question whether the acoustic quality of JI is of importance. It tends to focus on algebraic structures such as mos scales and generalizations.
    • JI indifferentism: this school does not believe the acoustic quality of JI is of importance. Practice in this school is orthogonal to the influence of JI.
  • Tuning empiricism
  • Tuning stochasticism

Important prime limits

2-limit (rank-1)
  • Essential equivalence
  • Completes the harmonic series for the first octave
3-limit (rank-2)
  • Essential interval functions
  • Completes the harmonic series for the first 2 octaves
  • Rank is a highly composite number
5-limit (rank-3)
  • Completes the harmonic series for the first 2 octaves and a fifth
7-limit (rank-4)
  • Tonality: tonal
  • Categorical characteristics: pivotal and semiambitonal
  • Completes the harmonic series for the first 3 octaves
  • Rank is a highly composite number
11-limit (rank-5)
  • Completes the harmonic series for the first 3 octaves and a fifth
13-limit (rank-6)
  • Essential interval colors
  • Tonality: microtonal
  • Categorical characteristics: ambitonal and semiambitonal
  • Completes the harmonic series for the first 4 octaves
  • Rank is a highly composite number
23-limit (rank-9)
  • Limit of classical functional harmony
  • Limit of classical concordance
  • Tonality: pseudotonal and pseudomicrotonal
  • Categorical characteristics: pseudoambitonal
  • Completes the harmonic series for the first 4 octaves and a fifth
  • Followed by a record prime gap
31-limit (rank-11)
  • Completes the harmonic series for the first 5 octaves
37-limit (rank-12)
  • Rank is a highly composite number
47-limit (rank-15)
  • Completes the harmonic series for the first 5 octaves and a fifth
61-limit (rank-18)
  • Completes the harmonic series for the first 6 octaves
89-limit (rank-24)
  • Completes the harmonic series for the first 6 octaves and a fifth
  • Followed by a record prime gap
  • Rank is a highly composite number

Edo sizes

  • Exo: 0–9
  • Small: 10–38
    • Semitonic: 10–14
    • Subsemitonic: 15–26
    • Dietic: 27–38
  • Medium: 39–79
    • Commatic: 39–67
    • Subcommatic: 68–79
  • Large: 80–190
    • Hemicommatic: 80–132
    • Codettic: 133–137
    • Kleismatic: 138–190
  • Mega: 191+
    • Subkleismatic
    • Hemikleismatic