Talk:Pergen

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion.

Note to self: "Mids never appear in the perchain." Check that expanding the definition of mid intervals to include the 4th and 5th hasn't changed this. TallKite (talk) 04:46, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Cmloegcmluin's clarification questions

I came across this page yesterday because Jason suggested it as a better approach to the problem TAMNAMS is trying to solve. But I can't get very far before I'm lost. "Both fractions are always of the form 1/N, thus the octave and/or the 3-limit interval is split into N parts. The interval which is split into multiple generators is the multigen. The 3-limit multigen is referred to not by its ratio but by its conventional name, e.g. P5, M6, m7, etc." What is N? And what are these conventional names P5, M6, m7? --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 16:57, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

In (P8, P5/3), N is 3. In (P8/4, P5), N is 4. In (P8/2, M2/4), well, I didn't state that very well, I guess there are two N's, which may or may not be equal. Later I adopt a notation (P8/m, M/n), where M stands for multigen. So for (P8/2, M2/4) we have m=2, n=4.
P stands for perfect, M for major (or multigen if not followed by a number) and m for minor. It's a 3-limit interval, so M2 = major 2nd = 9/8, A4 = aug 4th = 729/512, etc.
Okay, thanks. If there's a place where that terminology is explained, that might be great to link to (people like me who never formally studied music and are unfamiliar with those abbreviations might benefit.
And re: N, what I meant was more like: what does it mean? Does the letter N stand for something? Or does that value represent something I would be familiar with? Or is it just some abstract number to work with? It's probably obvious to some readers (esp. given the way you matter-of-factly present it) but I have no idea myself. Thanks for indulging my questions. Hopefully I can at least help improve the accessibility of the ideas for others. --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 23:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Explanation of M2, m7, etc.: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interval_(music)#Main_intervals. Knowing these terms really helps with chord names like CM6 and Dm7.
N doesn't stand for anything. It's like x or y in algebra. But N isn't really important. The important thing is the pergen. I only wrote "Both fractions are always of the form 1/N" because I wanted to make clear that there is no "two-thirds-of-a-fifth" pergen. IOW the fraction always has a numerator of 1. If N still confuses you, I suggest you just ignore it. --TallKite (talk) 05:39, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Kite's thoughts on canonical generators, which imply canonical mappings

The canonical generator of a rank-2 pergen is called the best-multigen generator. This is found by:

  1. minimizing the absolute value of the 2nd number in a multigen's monzo (e.g. P5/2 over M2/4 because P5 = (-1 1) and M2 = (-3 2)). I suspect this also minimizes the multigen's fraction.
  2. next, choosing the least-cents voicing of the multigen (e.g. P4/2 over P12/2 and P11/3 over P12/3)
  3. and finally, if the generator is P4, using P5 instead, to follow historical practice.

But a very popular canonical generator is the one that has the least cents. (x31eq.com's mappings always imply this generator.) If the least-cents generator differs from the best-multigen generator, it's always of the form G - nP or nP - G, where P = period, G = best-multigen generator, and n = round ((cents of G)/(cents of P)). A pergen that uses this alternate generator is called a least-cents pergen.

The best-multigen generator works better harmonically, and the least-cents generator works better melodically. For example with (P8/2, P5), MOS scales can be thought of as two familiar chains of 5ths, offset by a half-octave. Whereas with the corresponding least-cents pergen (P8/2, M2/2), MOS scales can be thought of as each half of the octave being filled in by a stack of semitones. But the best-multigen generator has the advantage that it simplifies the process of finding an ideal notation. This is why the best-multigen pergen is the canonical pergen.

The least-cents generator differs from the best-multigen generator in two cases. In the trivial case, the unsplit pergen becomes (P8, P4). The other case occurs sometimes but not always when the period is not an octave. The least-cents multigen in this case is always imperfect, because step #1 is skipped. PergenLister displays the least-cents generator's cents in the 3rd column. It usually displays this generator as a fraction of an imperfect multigen in the "Unreduced Pergen" column. However unreduced pergens #16 and #27 are not least-cents. This is because the purpose of this column is to find an alternate notation, not to find the least-cents generator.

Thus for many temperaments there are two canonical mappings, one for each type of canonical generator. Except for the trivial case, both are useful and IMO the xenwiki should list both. For example, Sagugu aka Srutal is (P8/2, P5), which implies the mapping [(2 2 7) (0 1 -2)]. But the least-cents pergen (P8/2, M2/2) implies the mapping [(2 3 5) (0 1 -2)]. Another example: Trigu aka Augmented is (P8/3, P5) which implies [(3 3 4) (0 1 0)]. But the least-cents pergen (P8/3, m3/3) implies [(3 5 0) (0 -1 0)]. However any temperament in which the least-cents generator is the same as the best-multigen generator has only one canonical mapping, e.g. Zozo aka Semaphore which is (P8, P4/2).

This table shows the least-cents generator for pergens 1-32, if it differs from the best-multigen generator (asterisk indicates a true double):

best-multigen generator least-cents generator
unsplit pergen generator cents
1 (P8, P5) 700 + c P - G P4 500 - c
half-split pergens
2 (P8/2, P5) 700 + c G - P M2/2 100 + c
3 (P8, P4/2) 250 - c/2
4 (P8, P5/2) 350 + c/2
5 (P8/2, P4/2) * 250 - c/2
third-split pergens
6 (P8/3, P5) 700 + c 2P - G m3/3 100 - c
7 (P8, P4/3) 167 - c/3
8 (P8, P5/3) 233 + c/3
9 (P8, P11/3) 567 - c/3
10 (P8/3, P4/2) 250 - c/2 P - G M6/6 150 + c/2
11 (P8/3, P5/2) 350 + c/2 P - G m3/6 50 - c/2
12 (P8/2, P4/3) 167 - c/3
13 (P8/2, P5/3) 233 + c/3
14 (P8/2, P11/3) 567 - c/3 P - G M2/6 33 + c/6
15 (P8/3, P4/3) * 167 - c/3
quarter-split pergens
16 (P8/4, P5) 700 + c G - 2P M3/4 100 + c
17 (P8, P4/4) 125 - c/4
18 (P8, P5/4) 175 + c/4
19 (P8, P11/4) 425 - c/4
20 (P8, P12/4) 475 + c/4
21 (P8/4, P4/2) * 250 - c/2 P - G M2/4 50 + c/2
22 (P8/2, M2/4) 50 + c/2
23 (P8/2, P4/4) * 125 - c/4
24 (P8/2, P5/4) * 175 + c/4
25 (P8/4, P4/3) 167 - c/3 P - G M10/12 133 + c/3
26 (P8/4, P5/3) 233 + c/3 P - G m6/12 67 - c/3
27 (P8/4, P11/3) 567 - c/3 2P - G M2/6 33 + c/3
28 (P8/3, P4/4) 125 - c/4
29 (P8/3, P5/4) 175 + c/4
30 (P8/3, P11/4) 425 - c/4 G - P m3/12 25 - c/4
31 (P8/3, P12/4) 475 + c/4 G - P M6/12 75 + c/4
32 (P8/4, P4/4) * 125 - c/4

Updated terminology

Ups and downs are collectively called arrows. Lifts and drops are collectively called slants. Arrows and slants are collectively called inflections. Thus a better term for "bare" enharmonic is uninflected enharmonic. The article has been edited to correct this. Also, the term "E" for enharmonic interval has been replaced with EI. --TallKite (talk) 02:19, 17 December 2023 (UTC)