# A brief introduction to Regular Temperament Theory

by Dave Keenan

Dissonance is easy. Consonance is rare. The most common kind of consonance occurs when two notes have their frequencies approximating a simple ratio.

We like to have different flavors of consonance, which correspond to different simple ratios. We want to find tunings — sets of notes — that will give us enough consonances in enough flavors, without being too complex, and without having errors that are too large. The complexity of a tuning is partly about the number of notes per octave, and partly about the number of different step sizes.

Regular Temperament Theory is a powerful tool to aid us in finding such tunings. It observes that the problem of approximating many simple ratios can be reduced to one of approximating a few small prime numbers. It then generates all of its tunings by stacking (both up and down) a small number of intervals which are called the generators. In one extreme, the generators are the small prime numbers themselves, giving just intonation (JI) as a lattice, having zero errors but high complexity. In another extreme, there is a single small generator whose iterations must approximate all the desired primes, giving an equal temperament (ET), having low complexity but high errors.

These two extremes were well explored prior to RTT. What RTT did was open up a vast middle ground between JI and ET, where the number of generators is greater than one but less than the number of primes being approximated. These are called regular temperaments (RT). Only a very small region of that middle ground had been explored prior to RTT, namely the "meantone" region that approximates primes 2, 3 and 5, using two generators which are an octave (prime 2) and a slightly narrow fifth (approximate 2:3).

When the generation of tunings is formulated in this way, the tools of linear algebra can be applied.

The defining thing about a regular temperament is the the count of each generator required to approximate each prime number. This is called the temperament's mapping, and can be represented as a matrix.

We can then institute computer searches to find optimum mappings, with our desired balance of error versus complexity. Many such searches have been done and many resulting temperaments named and catalogued.

1. where "approximating" means something like "having errors less than 30 cents".
2. where "simple" means something like "involving a pair of integers whose product is less than 1000".
3. Strictly speaking, it is the canonical form of the mapping matrix that defines the temperament, because you can replace any set of generators with linear combinations of those generators, and change the mapping accordingly, to obtain the same temperament.