User talk:Flirora/EDO impressions

Diatonicity notation

This m,n-diatonic notation looks quite expressive to me. Is this just an ad hoc invention of yours or a more common convention? --Xenwolf (talk) 11:34, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

It's an ad hoc invention of mine. --Flirora (talk) 13:02, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Space Tour

Hello. I just saw your EDO impressions page, and when I saw that you said there's not much point in going much bigger than 31edo, I must confess that my first thought was "Really now? You must not have heard of my more recent song 'Space Tour'..." and I'm sure such a thing is quite rude, so I'm sorry about that. Still, I do have to say that as others have listened to the song- written in a near-perfect approximation of 159edo- and they seem to really like it. I hope you like it too. --Aura (talk) 15:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Yep, I've listened to it a few days ago and loved it. Perhaps "not much of a point in going bigger" is the wrong wording; sorry if it got to you in the wrong way. I think it's a combination of "larger EDOs having less distinct character/fewer limitations" and "larger EDOs being less practical to work with". --Flirora (talk) 15:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Flirora/EDO impressions".