Talk:Sharpness

Sharpness table coverage

Tables on this wiki have a tendency to grow indefinitely, and we need a solution. Maybe we should find a consensus right here for this particular case. Since if someone decides to expand the table to cover 99edo cuz it's useful, why stop there? Someone else might argue 171edo is very useful and should be included too. I for one think this table is meant to be an illustration of the concept, so as the user understands it, they can make their own tables instead. For this reason, I think 72edo is more than enough, tho I wouldn't oppose to setting the limit to 99edo, which is consistent with Consistency limits of small edos and similar pages. —FloraC (talk) 19:17, 14 April 2026 (UTC)