Talk:Defactoring algorithms
Readability and conclusion
This article is way too hard to read than necessary. It looks more like a note rather than an article, with so much development information that's better off collected in a dedicated "history" section. The algorithms should be presented much much more concisely.
The algorithms are currently presented in Mathematica, which isn't quite easy to decode. I think it should be presented in math formula or pseudocode.
The conclusion seems pretty subjective. I'm not sure "Hermite decomposition" can be treated as a single operation. It's (perhaps superficially) the case in Mathematica, but not in other programming languages or math in general.
I wonder if the original author(s) of this article will do me a favor to allow me to clean it up. Otherwise I'll have to start anew.