Talk:BOP tuning: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) →Wilson height, not Wilson tuning: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
There are 12 instances of "n/d" on this page which probably were all intended to be "nd". I cannot make these changes myself, though; the page is locked to admins only. So if an admin could take care of it, I would appreciate it. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 05:22, 13 April 2022 (UTC) | There are 12 instances of "n/d" on this page which probably were all intended to be "nd". I cannot make these changes myself, though; the page is locked to admins only. So if an admin could take care of it, I would appreciate it. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 05:22, 13 April 2022 (UTC) | ||
: These all occur in sopfr () since it's supposed to take a multiplicative interval, right? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 21:54, 14 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
== Wilson height, not Wilson tuning == | == Wilson height, not Wilson tuning == | ||
Revision as of 21:54, 14 April 2022
Typos
There are 12 instances of "n/d" on this page which probably were all intended to be "nd". I cannot make these changes myself, though; the page is locked to admins only. So if an admin could take care of it, I would appreciate it. --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 05:22, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
- These all occur in sopfr () since it's supposed to take a multiplicative interval, right? FloraC (talk) 21:54, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Wilson height, not Wilson tuning
I believe where the page says "it is also optimal using the Wilson tuning" it means to say "it is also optimal using the Wilson height", because the "it" here seems to refer to "BOP tuning".
The fact that it is formatted as a link might also suggest that it was meant to link to the Wilson height article, which does exist.
And if a "Wilson tuning" existed, according to the article, it'd be the same as BOP tuning, and so the link would be a redirect to the page itself, and thus pointless.
I cannot make the change because I'm not an admin. If an admin could take care of this fix, I would appreciate it. --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 16:58, 14 April 2022 (UTC)