Talk:Optimal ET sequence: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:36, 23 November 2021 view source Cmloegcmluin (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 5,160 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:28, 23 November 2021 view source FloraC (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Sysops 18,328 edits re Newer edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:: After I understand this particular detail, I'll make a brief post on the Facebook Xenwiki Work Group and the Discord wiki channel to see if anyone has any dispute with renaming this "ET sequence", which I agree should suit this feature well (and better than "val list"). --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 19:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)		:: After I understand this particular detail, I'll make a brief post on the Facebook Xenwiki Work Group and the Discord wiki channel to see if anyone has any dispute with renaming this "ET sequence", which I agree should suit this feature well (and better than "val list"). --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 19:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

			::: The sequence "terminates" as no more GPVs turn up after a sufficiently large index. Any temperament has a fixed error, whereas the sequence of all GPV's errors converges to zero, so all GPVs has less error than the temperament past a certain point. Obviously my code doesn't know it, and you must set the range yourself. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 21:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)