6000000edo: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
Add another sentence to make clear what you mean. I think this information doesn't belong here, but to Microtone. Undo revision 80043 by Moremajorthanmajor (talk)
Tag: Undo
Line 3: Line 3:
While this system is absurdly large for any human application, from a technical standpoint it is the only one that rightfully bears the name [[Microtonal|'''microtonal''']], since it divides a tone, which is 1/6th of an octave, into 1'000'000 steps, and the SI prefix "micro-" denotes division of a unit into 1 million parts.
While this system is absurdly large for any human application, from a technical standpoint it is the only one that rightfully bears the name [[Microtonal|'''microtonal''']], since it divides a tone, which is 1/6th of an octave, into 1'000'000 steps, and the SI prefix "micro-" denotes division of a unit into 1 million parts.


This title can be contested by 1000000ed9/8, approx. 5884949edo, if a "tone" is defined to be a just [[9/8]] interval instead of an octave fraction, or other tuning between 5000000edo and 7000000edo.
This title can be contested by 1000000ed9/8, approx. 5884949edo, if a "tone" is defined to be a just [[9/8]] interval instead of an octave fraction.


== Theory ==
== Theory ==