OD: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Your sequence will be equivalent to some [[OS|OS (otonal sequence)]]. E.g. 8-OD7 = 8-OS3/4, because to get from 1 to 7 you cover 6 overtones, and 6 divided by 8 is 3/4. | Your sequence will be equivalent to some [[OS|OS (otonal sequence)]]. E.g. 8-OD7 = 8-OS3/4, because to get from 1 to 7 you cover 6 overtones, and 6 divided by 8 is 3/4. | ||
The equivalent utonal version of an OD is a [[UD]]. | |||
If you want to describe overtones 1-9 with OD you would need to use 8-OD9, because there are only 8 steps from 1 to 9. You could think of it like 9 is the 8th overtone, so you're really dividing 8 by 8. You're dividing the number of overtones. Alternatively, you could describe his as an [[OS|OS, or overtone sequence]], by simply saying 8-OS. | If you want to describe overtones 1-9 with OD you would need to use 8-OD9, because there are only 8 steps from 1 to 9. You could think of it like 9 is the 8th overtone, so you're really dividing 8 by 8. You're dividing the number of overtones. Alternatively, you could describe his as an [[OS|OS, or overtone sequence]], by simply saying 8-OS. | ||