Talk:Neji: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→The Neji lemma: new section |
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The '''[[Neji]]''' lemma seems to have the tendency to expand. Maybe a disambiguation would fit better than a plain redirect, because of the [[Well temperament]]s which also aim to equalize their steps. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 07:51, 1 October 2020 (UTC) | The '''[[Neji]]''' lemma seems to have the tendency to expand. Maybe a disambiguation would fit better than a plain redirect, because of the [[Well temperament]]s which also aim to equalize their steps. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 07:51, 1 October 2020 (UTC) | ||
My current recommendation is that we create a page for "quasi-equal rational tunings" and have NEJI redirect there instead, since NEJI is not synonymous with overtone scales, but actually synonymous with the concept which as far as I can tell was first described by George Secor here: http://www.anaphoria.com/secor-blarney.html | |||
--[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 20:03, 15 March 2021 | |||
Revision as of 03:05, 16 March 2021
The Neji lemma
The Neji lemma seems to have the tendency to expand. Maybe a disambiguation would fit better than a plain redirect, because of the Well temperaments which also aim to equalize their steps. --Xenwolf (talk) 07:51, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
My current recommendation is that we create a page for "quasi-equal rational tunings" and have NEJI redirect there instead, since NEJI is not synonymous with overtone scales, but actually synonymous with the concept which as far as I can tell was first described by George Secor here: http://www.anaphoria.com/secor-blarney.html --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 20:03, 15 March 2021