Talk:Tuning ranges of regular temperaments: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Def of nice range == | == Def of nice range == | ||
I don't understand this: "we may define a tuning range by finding the convex hull in tuning space of the tunings with one eigenmonzo 2 (pure octaves tunings) and the rest [of what?] a set of r - 1 members [why doesn't it matter which r-1 members we choose?] of the p-odd limit tonality diamond, when this tuning [how is "this" tuning chosen?] is defined." | I don't understand this: "we may define a tuning range by finding the convex hull in tuning space of the tunings with one eigenmonzo 2 (pure octaves tunings) and the rest [of what?] a set of r - 1 members [why doesn't it matter which r-1 members we choose?] of the p-odd limit tonality diamond, when this tuning [how is "this" tuning chosen?] is defined." Actual math notation and formatting procedures as lists would help, if nothing else. [[User:IlL|Inthar]] ([[User talk:IlL|talk]]) 12:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:45, 28 January 2021
Def of nice range
I don't understand this: "we may define a tuning range by finding the convex hull in tuning space of the tunings with one eigenmonzo 2 (pure octaves tunings) and the rest [of what?] a set of r - 1 members [why doesn't it matter which r-1 members we choose?] of the p-odd limit tonality diamond, when this tuning [how is "this" tuning chosen?] is defined." Actual math notation and formatting procedures as lists would help, if nothing else. Inthar (talk) 12:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)