92edo: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
added information about the 52\92 fifth, to which the 53\92 generator was presented as an alternative |
in my last comment I should have written 54\92 (see table), now for clarity added in the text as well |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The 92 divisions of '''92edo''' measure 13.0435 cents each. 92 is contorted through the 17-limit, with the same tuning and commas as [[46edo]], and hence attracts little interest, the [[patent fifth]] is about 2.4 cents sharp. The alternate 53\92 generator is a very flat flattone fifth, flatter even than [[26edo]]. 92edo is the highest in a series of four consecutive EDOs to temper out the [[quartisma]] (117440512/117406179). | The 92 divisions of '''92edo''' measure 13.0435 cents each. 92 is contorted through the 17-limit, with the same tuning and commas as [[46edo]], and hence attracts little interest, the [[patent fifth]] (54\92) is about 2.4 cents sharp. The alternate 53\92 generator is a very flat flattone fifth, flatter even than [[26edo]]. 92edo is the highest in a series of four consecutive EDOs to temper out the [[quartisma]] (117440512/117406179). | ||
== Prime intervals == | == Prime intervals == | ||
Revision as of 08:58, 18 January 2021
The 92 divisions of 92edo measure 13.0435 cents each. 92 is contorted through the 17-limit, with the same tuning and commas as 46edo, and hence attracts little interest, the patent fifth (54\92) is about 2.4 cents sharp. The alternate 53\92 generator is a very flat flattone fifth, flatter even than 26edo. 92edo is the highest in a series of four consecutive EDOs to temper out the quartisma (117440512/117406179).
Prime intervals
Script error: No such module "primes_in_edo".