Talk:7/4: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:52, 25 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 22:55, 25 October 2020 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled 5,920 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 20:		Line 20:

	:::::: Remember what I said about the 11-limit being mathematically derivable as an excellent representation for quartertones in terms of ratio simplicity? This means that the paramajor fourth (that is, 11/8) is also pretty good on this front, and indeed it does perform an axis function where quartertones are concerned. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 22:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC)		:::::: Remember what I said about the 11-limit being mathematically derivable as an excellent representation for quartertones in terms of ratio simplicity? This means that the paramajor fourth (that is, 11/8) is also pretty good on this front, and indeed it does perform an axis function where quartertones are concerned. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 22:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

			:::::: I've since checked the 11-limit's representation of quarter tones against that for of the intervals called quarter tones [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pitch_intervals on Wikipedia's list of pitch intervals] and found the 11-limit's 33/32 to be better than any of them in terms of ratio simplicity. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 22:55, 25 October 2020 (UTC)