Talk:MOS scale: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Revision as of 11:10, 7 October 2020 view source Arseniiv (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 347 edits →Good MOS for a particular JI subgroup: new section ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:25, 12 October 2020 view source Arseniiv (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 347 edits m →Good MOS for a particular JI subgroup: added a note to self and thanks to you Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Also in that vein, maybe you know some shiny MOS which greatly differs from EDOs smaller than ~20edo? (and with not too many steps?..) I experimented with several modes (MOS and otherwise) of 22edo, 19edo, 17edo and several other EDOs but hopefully there is a nice MOS somewhere which doesn’t want to fit as an EDO mode without making the original intervals greatly worse. --[[User:Arseniiv\|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv\|talk]]) 11:10, 7 October 2020 (UTC)		Also in that vein, maybe you know some shiny MOS which greatly differs from EDOs smaller than ~20edo? (and with not too many steps?..) I experimented with several modes (MOS and otherwise) of 22edo, 19edo, 17edo and several other EDOs but hopefully there is a nice MOS somewhere which doesn’t want to fit as an EDO mode without making the original intervals greatly worse. --[[User:Arseniiv\|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv\|talk]]) 11:10, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

			: Ah, I see [[Subgroup temperaments]] in particular. That article would be helpful, thank you all for making it! --[[User:Arseniiv\|Arseniiv]] ([[User talk:Arseniiv\|talk]]) 15:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)