33/32: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Added information comparing 33/32 to 28/27 in terms of functionality |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
'''33/32''', the '''al-Farabi quarter tone'''<ref>The name goes back to Abu Nasr Al-Farabi (in Western reception also Alpharabius), see [[wikipedia:Al-Farabi]] </ref>, '''undecimal quarter tone''', or '''undecimal comma''', is a [[superparticular]] [[ratio]] which differs by a [[385/384|keenanisma (385/384)]], from the [[36/35|septimal quarter tone (36/35)]]. Raising a just [[4/3|perfect fourth (4/3)]] by the al-Farabi quarter-tone leads to the [[11/8|undecimal super-fourth (11/8)]]. Raising it instead by 36/35 leads to the [[48/35|septimal super-fourth (48/35)]] which approximates 11/8. | '''33/32''', the '''al-Farabi quarter tone'''<ref>The name goes back to Abu Nasr Al-Farabi (in Western reception also Alpharabius), see [[wikipedia:Al-Farabi]] </ref>, '''undecimal quarter tone''', or '''undecimal comma''', is a [[superparticular]] [[ratio]] which differs by a [[385/384|keenanisma (385/384)]], from the [[36/35|septimal quarter tone (36/35)]]. Raising a just [[4/3|perfect fourth (4/3)]] by the al-Farabi quarter-tone leads to the [[11/8|undecimal super-fourth (11/8)]]. Raising it instead by 36/35 leads to the [[48/35|septimal super-fourth (48/35)]] which approximates 11/8. | ||
Because of its close proximity to [[28/27]], form which it differs only by [[Pentacircle comma|896/891]], one could reasonably argue that 33/32 is the undecimal counterpart to 28/27, particularly if treated as an interval in its own right- in fact, 33/32 could arguably have been used as a melodic interval in the Greek Enharmonic Genus. The resulting tetrachord would include 32:33:34 within the interval of a perfect fourth. This ancient Greek scale can be approximated in [[22edo]] and [[24edo]], if the comma 1089/1088 is tempered so that 33/32 and 34/33 are equated. | |||
33/32 is significant in [[Functional Just System]] as the undecimal formal comma which translates a Pythagorean interval to a nearby undecimal interval. Apart from the aforementioned relationship between 4/3 and 11/8, it is also the interval between [[32/27]] and [[11/9]], and between [[9/8]] and [[12/11]]. | 33/32 is significant in [[Functional Just System]] as the undecimal formal comma which translates a Pythagorean interval to a nearby undecimal interval. Apart from the aforementioned relationship between 4/3 and 11/8, it is also the interval between [[32/27]] and [[11/9]], and between [[9/8]] and [[12/11]]. | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
<references/> | <references /> | ||
[[Category:11-limit]] | [[Category:11-limit]] |
Revision as of 19:41, 17 September 2020
Interval information |
undecimal quarter tone,
undecimal comma
reduced,
reduced harmonic
[sound info]
33/32, the al-Farabi quarter tone[1], undecimal quarter tone, or undecimal comma, is a superparticular ratio which differs by a keenanisma (385/384), from the septimal quarter tone (36/35). Raising a just perfect fourth (4/3) by the al-Farabi quarter-tone leads to the undecimal super-fourth (11/8). Raising it instead by 36/35 leads to the septimal super-fourth (48/35) which approximates 11/8.
Because of its close proximity to 28/27, form which it differs only by 896/891, one could reasonably argue that 33/32 is the undecimal counterpart to 28/27, particularly if treated as an interval in its own right- in fact, 33/32 could arguably have been used as a melodic interval in the Greek Enharmonic Genus. The resulting tetrachord would include 32:33:34 within the interval of a perfect fourth. This ancient Greek scale can be approximated in 22edo and 24edo, if the comma 1089/1088 is tempered so that 33/32 and 34/33 are equated.
33/32 is significant in Functional Just System as the undecimal formal comma which translates a Pythagorean interval to a nearby undecimal interval. Apart from the aforementioned relationship between 4/3 and 11/8, it is also the interval between 32/27 and 11/9, and between 9/8 and 12/11.
See also
References
- ↑ The name goes back to Abu Nasr Al-Farabi (in Western reception also Alpharabius), see wikipedia:Al-Farabi