Talk:Extra-Diatonic Intervals: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "Your name preferences are very controversial and subjective. I'm not having a minor second without an augmented unison, as that seems very awkward. See User:PiotrGrochowski/..."
 
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
re +1
Line 1: Line 1:
Your name preferences are very controversial and subjective. I'm not having a minor second without an augmented unison, as that seems very awkward. See [[User:PiotrGrochowski/Extra-Diatonic Intervals]]. [[User:PiotrGrochowski|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski|talk]]) 05:12, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Your name preferences are very controversial and subjective. I'm not having a minor second without an augmented unison, as that seems very awkward. See [[User:PiotrGrochowski/Extra-Diatonic Intervals]]. [[User:PiotrGrochowski|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski|talk]]) 05:12, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
: Good point, also Tritone could be rephrased as augmented 4th or diminished 5th. But here we are still talking about ''classic'' diatonic intervals. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 10:28, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:28, 1 October 2018

Your name preferences are very controversial and subjective. I'm not having a minor second without an augmented unison, as that seems very awkward. See User:PiotrGrochowski/Extra-Diatonic Intervals. PiotrGrochowski (talk) 05:12, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Good point, also Tritone could be rephrased as augmented 4th or diminished 5th. But here we are still talking about classic diatonic intervals. --Xenwolf (talk) 10:28, 1 October 2018 (UTC)