Talk:Ploidacot/Triploid monocot: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Ploid numbers: follow-up |
Re |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I also just realized that the ploid numbers seperate by interval size, not which ploid the interval is reached from by generators. This looks much more confusing, and I think it should follow interval chains on temperament pages instead. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 03:06, 28 March 2026 (UTC) | I also just realized that the ploid numbers seperate by interval size, not which ploid the interval is reached from by generators. This looks much more confusing, and I think it should follow interval chains on temperament pages instead. --[[User:Overthink|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink|talk]]) 03:06, 28 March 2026 (UTC) | ||
: Agreed. Tbh these ploidacot articles need massive cleanup. —[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:42, 28 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:42, 28 March 2026
Ploid numbers
It currently says "Ploid 1", "Ploid 2", and "Ploid 3" on the interval table. I believe they should be "Ploid 0", "Ploid 1", and "Ploid 2" instead. Other pages also start at 1 instead of 0, and I also think it's better to change them to be that way. This way the ploid number will actually match the number of ploids the interval is displaced by from the unison. --Overthink (talk) 02:57, 28 March 2026 (UTC)
I also just realized that the ploid numbers seperate by interval size, not which ploid the interval is reached from by generators. This looks much more confusing, and I think it should follow interval chains on temperament pages instead. --Overthink (talk) 03:06, 28 March 2026 (UTC)