Category talk:Lumatone mappings: Difference between revisions

Line 11:

== Sorting for non-octave tunings ==

I have it from an inside source that Lumatone mappings for non-octave tunings are going to be coming in REAL SOON — what should we do to keep these from getting inconveniently interleaved with the Lumatone mappings for octave tunings. (Right now, it's just Lumatone mapping for Bohlen-Pierce to worry about, but [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio/Keyboard Layout Lab/Non-Octave Lumatone mappings|a couple of non-octave equal temperament mappings]] are on the way). [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 07:58, 18 October 2025 (UTC)~~<br>~~

I have it from an inside source that Lumatone mappings for non-octave tunings are going to be coming in REAL SOON — what should we do to keep these from getting inconveniently interleaved with the Lumatone mappings for octave tunings. (Right now, it's just Lumatone mapping for Bohlen-Pierce to worry about, but [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio/Keyboard Layout Lab/Non-Octave Lumatone mappings|a couple of non-octave equal temperament mappings]] are on the way). [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 07:58, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Update: I found that the Navbox Lumatone template thinks that non-octave mappings are EDO mappings, including trying to fit them into the Lumatone mapping for ### series for navigation, so as a workaround I used <nowiki>[[Category:Lumatone mappings]]</nowiki>, which gets them into Category:Lumatone mappings separately from the EDO series, so that is a temporary fix for this particular problem. But once Navbox Lumatone is fixed to recognize non-octave tunings as such, this problem will most likely recur, unless the updated Navbox Lumatone code itself is somehow able to fix this. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 08:06, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Update: I found that the Navbox Lumatone template thinks that non-octave mappings are EDO mappings, including trying to fit them into the Lumatone mapping for ### series for navigation, so as a workaround I used <nowiki>[[Category:Lumatone mappings]]</nowiki>, which gets them into Category:Lumatone mappings separately from the EDO series, so that is a temporary fix for this particular problem. But once Navbox Lumatone is fixed to recognize non-octave tunings as such, this problem will most likely recur, unless the updated Navbox Lumatone code itself is somehow able to fix this. So far have 3 pages currently affected (really should be 4, but Lumatone mapping for Bohlen-Pierce currently counts as a named tuning temperament page and not Lumatone mapping for 13edt, whereas it is actually both). [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 08:12, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 == Sorting for non-octave tunings ==
-I have it from an inside source that Lumatone mappings for non-octave tunings are going to be coming in REAL SOON &mdash; what should we do to keep these from getting inconveniently interleaved with the Lumatone mappings for octave tunings.  (Right now, it's just Lumatone mapping for Bohlen-Pierce to worry about, but [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio/Keyboard Layout Lab/Non-Octave Lumatone mappings|a couple of non-octave equal temperament mappings]] are on the way).  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 07:58, 18 October 2025 (UTC)<br>
+I have it from an inside source that Lumatone mappings for non-octave tunings are going to be coming in REAL SOON &mdash; what should we do to keep these from getting inconveniently interleaved with the Lumatone mappings for octave tunings.  (Right now, it's just Lumatone mapping for Bohlen-Pierce to worry about, but [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio/Keyboard Layout Lab/Non-Octave Lumatone mappings|a couple of non-octave equal temperament mappings]] are on the way).  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 07:58, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
-Update:  I found that the Navbox Lumatone template thinks that non-octave mappings are EDO mappings, including trying to fit them into the Lumatone mapping for ### series for navigation, so as a workaround I used <nowiki>[[Category:Lumatone mappings]]</nowiki>, which gets them into Category:Lumatone mappings separately from the EDO series, so that is a temporary fix for this particular problem. But once Navbox Lumatone is fixed to recognize non-octave tunings as such, this problem will most likely recur, unless the updated Navbox Lumatone code itself is somehow able to fix this.  [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 08:06, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
+Update:  I found that the Navbox Lumatone template thinks that non-octave mappings are EDO mappings, including trying to fit them into the Lumatone mapping for ### series for navigation, so as a workaround I used <nowiki>[[Category:Lumatone mappings]]</nowiki>, which gets them into Category:Lumatone mappings separately from the EDO series, so that is a temporary fix for this particular problem. But once Navbox Lumatone is fixed to recognize non-octave tunings as such, this problem will most likely recur, unless the updated Navbox Lumatone code itself is somehow able to fix this. So far have 3 pages currently affected (really should be 4, but Lumatone mapping for Bohlen-Pierce currently counts as a named tuning temperament page and not Lumatone mapping for 13edt, whereas it is actually both). [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 08:12, 23 October 2025 (UTC)