Talk:Map of linear temperaments: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Splitting the table in four: reply |
→Frost: reply |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== ''Frost'' == | == ''Frost'' == | ||
Should be treated as taken by 2.5.7.11-subgroup {245/242}, the minimal prime subgroup temp of the frostma. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:36, 20 October 2025 (UTC) | Should be treated as taken by 2.5.7.11-subgroup {245/242}, the minimal prime subgroup temp of the frostma. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 10:36, 20 October 2025 (UTC) | ||
: I don't really understand what this means, sorry. I took my quetiapine a couple minutes ago so my brain is very foggy. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth|talk]]) 10:42, 20 October 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:42, 20 October 2025
|
This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion. |
Splitting the table in four
What's the basis of this split? I'm afraid it introduces bias. FloraC (talk) 10:36, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- The split was because it was difficult both read and edit the huge uninterrupted wall of table. The reasons multiples of 150c were chosen is because they are the only spots which have nice round numbers which aren't in the middle of any of the temperaments already listed (eg not breaking porcupine or tetracot in half or whatever). Multiples of 200c would work too, but I went with 150c because that means each section is shorter thus more readable. But the choices were 150s or 200s. --BudjarnLambeth (talk) 10:41, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
Frost
Should be treated as taken by 2.5.7.11-subgroup {245/242}, the minimal prime subgroup temp of the frostma. FloraC (talk) 10:36, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- I don't really understand what this means, sorry. I took my quetiapine a couple minutes ago so my brain is very foggy. --BudjarnLambeth (talk) 10:42, 20 October 2025 (UTC)