User:BudjarnLambeth/Table of stretched 42edo tunings: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
BudjarnLambeth (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 85: Line 85:
| −30.1% <br>(8.6¢)
| −30.1% <br>(8.6¢)
|-
|-
! 2/1 mapping <br>(& reduced)
! 2/1 val <br>(& reduced)
| 42 <br>(0)
| 42 <br>(0)
| 42 <br>(0)
| 42 <br>(0)
Line 93: Line 93:
| 42 <br>(0)
| 42 <br>(0)
|-
|-
! 3/1 mapping
! 3/1 val
| 66 <br>(24)
| 66 <br>(24)
| 66 <br>(24)
| 66 <br>(24)
Line 101: Line 101:
| 67 <br>(25)
| 67 <br>(25)
|-
|-
! 5/1 mapping
! 5/1 val
| 97 <br>(13)
| 97 <br>(13)
| 97 <br>(13)
| 97 <br>(13)
Line 109: Line 109:
| 98 <br>(14)
| 98 <br>(14)
|-
|-
! 7/1 mapping
! 7/1 val
| 117 <br>(33)
| 117 <br>(33)
| 117 <br>(33)
| 117 <br>(33)
Line 117: Line 117:
| 118 <br>(34)
| 118 <br>(34)
|-
|-
! 11/1 mapping
! 11/1 val
| 144 <br>(18)
| 144 <br>(18)
| 145 <br>(19)
| 145 <br>(19)
Line 125: Line 125:
| 146 <br>(20)
| 146 <br>(20)
|-
|-
! 13/1 mapping
! 13/1 val
| 155 <br>(29)
| 155 <br>(29)
| 155 <br>(29)
| 155 <br>(29)

Revision as of 09:26, 7 December 2024

42edo has almost 50% relative error on harmonics 3/1 and 5/1. This means that whether one stretches or compresses the octave, either way it will improve 42edo’s approximations of JI, but in opposite directions.

This table provides a detailed comparison of three stretched- and two compressed-octave tunings for 42edo.

Tuning 42ed257/128 APS720jot 189zpi 42edo 191zpi 42ed255/128
Steps / octave ~41.77 ~41.81 ~41.83 42.00 ~42.19 ~42.24
Step size ~28.73¢ ~28.70¢ ~28.69¢ ~28.57¢ ~28.44¢ ~28.41¢
Overview great: 5
good: 2, 3, 7
okay:
bad: 11, 13
great: 5
good: 2, 3
okay: 7, 11, 13
bad:
great: 5
good: 2, 13
okay: 3, 11
bad: 7
great: 2, 7
good:
okay: 11
bad: 3, 5, 13
great: 5, 11, 13
good: 2, 3
okay:
bad: 7
great: 3, 5, 11
good: 2
okay: 13
bad: 7
2/1 error +23.5%
(6.7¢)
+19.0%
(5.5¢)
+17.2%
(4.9¢)
0.0%
(0.0¢)
−18.8%
(5.3¢)
−23.9%
(6.8¢)
3/1 error −19.6%
(5.6¢)
−26.7%
(7.7¢)
−29.6%
(8.5¢)
+43.2%
(12.3¢)
+13.4%
(3.8¢)
+5.4%
(1.5¢)
5/1 error +2.4%
(0.7¢)
−7.9%
(2.3¢)
−12.2%
(3.5¢)
+47.9%
(13.7¢)
+4.3%
(1.2¢)
−7.5%
(2.1¢)
7/1 error −24.9%
(7.2¢)
−37.5%
(10.8¢)
−42.6%
(12.2¢)
+9.1%
(2.6¢)
−43.6%
(12.4¢)
+42.2%
(12.0¢)
11/1 error −48.3%
(13.9¢)
+36.2%
(10.4¢)
+29.8%
(8.6¢)
−29.6%
(8.5¢)
+5.5%
(1.6¢)
−12.1%
3.4¢)
13/1 error +45.1%
(13.0¢)
+28.6%
(8.2¢)
+21.7%
(6.2¢)
−41.8%
(12.0¢)
−11.3%
(3.2¢)
−30.1%
(8.6¢)
2/1 val
(& reduced)
42
(0)
42
(0)
42
(0)
42
(0)
42
(0)
42
(0)
3/1 val 66
(24)
66
(24)
66
(24)
67
(25)
67
(25)
67
(25)
5/1 val 97
(13)
97
(13)
97
(13)
98
(14)
98
(14)
98
(14)
7/1 val 117
(33)
117
(33)
117
(33)
118
(34)
118
(34)
118
(34)
11/1 val 144
(18)
145
(19)
145
(19)
145
(19)
146
(20)
146
(20)
13/1 val 155
(29)
155
(29)
155
(29)
155
(29)
156
(30)
156
(30)
“great” = 0-12.5% relative error • “good” = 12.5-27.5% • “okay” = 27.5-40% • “bad” = 40-50%