Talk:Harmonic series: Difference between revisions
→Revisions of 2024-10-23: new section |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
What was wrong with the revision of 2024-10-23 by Em? I can point to 2 things -- removal of the Wikipedia link, and removal of most of the Music section -- but these could have been fixed without undoing everything. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 20:43, 23 October 2024 (UTC) | What was wrong with the revision of 2024-10-23 by Em? I can point to 2 things -- removal of the Wikipedia link, and removal of most of the Music section -- but these could have been fixed without undoing everything. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 20:43, 23 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
I was asked to take it down because I didn’t realize what the etiquette was for making large revisions and hadn’t properly run it by people, which I understand. As for the music section, that was largely part of why I did it in the first place: there was a lot of talk about making the articles more relevant to practicing musicians and explaining things from a music standpoint rather than a math standpoint. That being said, if people feel the page I wrote is good but don’t want that section, then that’s totally cool with me. Emily J. Green 03:06, 27 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:06, 27 October 2024
Glad to see that we now have correctly "Harmonic Series" as the default, and "Overtone Series" redirects to it --Wolftune (talk) 20:19, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, I think:
- * "Overtones" include nonharmonic overtones.
- * For instruments with only odd harmonics, 1st overtone = 3rd harmonic, 2nd overtone = 5th harmonic, ... (corresponding each resonance frequencies respectively.)
- See Partial. --Dummy index (talk) 12:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
Revisions of 2024-10-23
What was wrong with the revision of 2024-10-23 by Em? I can point to 2 things -- removal of the Wikipedia link, and removal of most of the Music section -- but these could have been fixed without undoing everything. Lucius Chiaraviglio (talk) 20:43, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
I was asked to take it down because I didn’t realize what the etiquette was for making large revisions and hadn’t properly run it by people, which I understand. As for the music section, that was largely part of why I did it in the first place: there was a lot of talk about making the articles more relevant to practicing musicians and explaining things from a music standpoint rather than a math standpoint. That being said, if people feel the page I wrote is good but don’t want that section, then that’s totally cool with me. Emily J. Green 03:06, 27 October 2024 (UTC)