User:Dave Keenan/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Dave Keenan (talk | contribs) |
Dave Keenan (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
EDOs in parentheses (6), (8), (13), and (18) have fifths that are so wide they are usually notated as subsets of larger EDOs with good fifths. [59]-EDO is in square brackets because it is green not gold on the periodic table, and so it should have a JI-based notation. However, its fifth is very close to the bad-fifth threshold and its 1-step symbol is only justified by the apotome-fraction notation, so its notation is a hybrid. | EDOs in parentheses (6), (8), (13), and (18) have fifths that are so wide they are usually notated as subsets of larger EDOs with good fifths. [59]-EDO is in square brackets because it is green not gold on the periodic table, and so it should have a JI-based notation. However, its fifth is very close to the bad-fifth threshold and its 1-step symbol is only justified by the apotome-fraction notation, so its notation is a hybrid. | ||
To obtain the Evo notations, replace the multishaft symbols above with their Evo equivalents from the previous table. | |||
=== Bad-fifths limma-fraction notation === | === Bad-fifths limma-fraction notation === | ||