User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio: Difference between revisions

Line 42:

::::::::::: I'll try to latch onto that next time I listen to 22EDO, but that prime limit is getting up there. (Although 12EDO attaches importance to primes 17 and 19, even though not for the fifth, so maybe I can pull it off.) [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio|talk]]) 07:24, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

:::::::::::: Yeah, the prime limit is getting pretty high, but 17 is a prime that I think helps immensely in simplifying some of the 2.3.11 gestures that I use, while 5 is another prime that does the same sort of stuff. I should know, considering I use 159edo frequently, and 94\159 makes for a pretty good 128/85 while 93\159 makes a superb 3/2. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 07:33, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

:::::::::::: Yeah, the prime limit is getting pretty high, but 17 is a prime that I think helps immensely in simplifying some of the 2.3.11 gestures that I use, while 5 is another prime that does the same sort of stuff. I should know, considering I use 159edo frequently, and that system is consistent to the 17-odd-limit. Not only that, but, as you might imagine, 94\159 makes for a pretty good 128/85 while 93\159 makes a superb 3/2. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 07:34, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:33, 15 October 2024 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 6,010 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 07:34, 15 October 2024 view source Aura (talk \| contribs) autopatrolled, emailconfirmed 6,010 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 42:		Line 42:
	::::::::::: I'll try to latch onto that next time I listen to 22EDO, but that prime limit is getting up there. (Although 12EDO attaches importance to primes 17 and 19, even though not for the fifth, so maybe I can pull it off.) [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 07:24, 15 October 2024 (UTC)		::::::::::: I'll try to latch onto that next time I listen to 22EDO, but that prime limit is getting up there. (Although 12EDO attaches importance to primes 17 and 19, even though not for the fifth, so maybe I can pull it off.) [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 07:24, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

	:::::::::::: Yeah, the prime limit is getting pretty high, but 17 is a prime that I think helps immensely in simplifying some of the 2.3.11 gestures that I use, while 5 is another prime that does the same sort of stuff. I should know, considering I use 159edo frequently, and 94\159 makes for a pretty good 128/85 while 93\159 makes a superb 3/2. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 07:33, 15 October 2024 (UTC)		:::::::::::: Yeah, the prime limit is getting pretty high, but 17 is a prime that I think helps immensely in simplifying some of the 2.3.11 gestures that I use, while 5 is another prime that does the same sort of stuff. I should know, considering I use 159edo frequently, and that system is consistent to the 17-odd-limit. Not only that, but, as you might imagine, 94\159 makes for a pretty good 128/85 while 93\159 makes a superb 3/2. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 07:34, 15 October 2024 (UTC)