Godtone (talk | contribs)
m addendum/consideration
Lériendil (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


: Hmm... actually, every temperament lies at a half-integer point! 34 & 142 is at 4.5 on the first continuum. That means we have the option of getting rid of the fractional temperaments section! Though it might still be useful to keep to see what temperaments are ''uniquely'' fractional w.r.t. both continua. What do you think (if you have a preference)? --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 01:32, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
: Hmm... actually, every temperament lies at a half-integer point! 34 & 142 is at 4.5 on the first continuum. That means we have the option of getting rid of the fractional temperaments section! Though it might still be useful to keep to see what temperaments are ''uniquely'' fractional w.r.t. both continua. What do you think (if you have a preference)? --[[User:Godtone|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone|talk]]) 01:32, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
: I think having half-integer temperaments is probably useful, though Fumica likely has other opinions. [[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 01:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)