Talk:Gamelismic clan: Difference between revisions
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Also, just thinking about good wiki practice: Although it says "once again", implying that this has been explained elsewhere, there is no citation or reference made, and I cannot find another place in the article that makes or elaborates on this point. I suggest / request that someone who knows what this is about either elaborate on the point in this paragraph, or link to an article or subarticle explains this. | Also, just thinking about good wiki practice: Although it says "once again", implying that this has been explained elsewhere, there is no citation or reference made, and I cannot find another place in the article that makes or elaborates on this point. I suggest / request that someone who knows what this is about either elaborate on the point in this paragraph, or link to an article or subarticle explains this. | ||
Thanks in advance for any insight you can share! |
Revision as of 20:55, 18 May 2024
![]() |
This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion. |
Undocumented temperament
Called "restles" in the temperament finder. http://x31eq.com/cgi-bin/rt.cgi?ets=77+%26+87&limit=7 FloraC (talk) 02:00, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
/Mothra
I am perplexed about something in this section. In the first paragraph it says, "Using 31edo with a generator of 6/31 is an excellent tuning choice. Once again something other than a mos should be used as a scale to get the most out of mothra."
The first part makes sense to me; that's how I make the 31edo hexatonic mothra mos scale that I'm familiar with.
But what would this non-MOS alternative look like? How does one build that scale? (All I can think of is adding whatever extra notes I want to make more harmonies and chords possible, but I am wondering if the original writer here has something methodical in mind, and wondering how you make it non-mos but still resolutely 'mothra'.)
Also, just thinking about good wiki practice: Although it says "once again", implying that this has been explained elsewhere, there is no citation or reference made, and I cannot find another place in the article that makes or elaborates on this point. I suggest / request that someone who knows what this is about either elaborate on the point in this paragraph, or link to an article or subarticle explains this.
Thanks in advance for any insight you can share!