Fifive family: Difference between revisions

Fredg999 category edits (talk | contribs)
m Removing from Category:Theory using Cat-a-lot
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs)
"optimal GPV sequence" → "optimal ET sequence", per Talk:Optimal_ET_sequence
Line 10: Line 10:
[[POTE generator]]: ~27/25 = 140.624
[[POTE generator]]: ~27/25 = 140.624


{{Val list|legend=1| 8, 26, 34, 94, 128 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8, 26, 34, 94, 128 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.205812
[[Badness]]: 0.205812
Line 27: Line 27:
[[POTE generator]]: ~27/25 = 140.349
[[POTE generator]]: ~27/25 = 140.349


{{Val list|legend=1| 8d, 26, 34d, 60d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8d, 26, 34d, 60d }}


[[Badness]]: 0.086669
[[Badness]]: 0.086669
Line 40: Line 40:
POTE generator: ~12/11 = 140.587
POTE generator: ~12/11 = 140.587


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 8d, 26, 34d, 60d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8d, 26, 34d, 60d }}


Badness: 0.040758
Badness: 0.040758
Line 53: Line 53:
POTE generator: ~12/11 = 140.554
POTE generator: ~12/11 = 140.554


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 8d, 26, 34d, 60d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8d, 26, 34d, 60d }}


Badness: 0.024368
Badness: 0.024368
Line 66: Line 66:
POTE generator: ~12/11 = 140.405
POTE generator: ~12/11 = 140.405


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 8d, 26, 34d, 60d }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8d, 26, 34d, 60d }}


Badness: 0.018567
Badness: 0.018567
Line 79: Line 79:
[[POTE generator]]: ~27/25 = 139.909
[[POTE generator]]: ~27/25 = 139.909


{{Val list|legend=1| 8, 26, 34, 60 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8, 26, 34, 60 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.130589
[[Badness]]: 0.130589
Line 92: Line 92:
POTE generator: ~12/11 = 139.884
POTE generator: ~12/11 = 139.884


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 8, 26, 34, 60 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8, 26, 34, 60 }}


Badness: 0.080306
Badness: 0.080306
Line 105: Line 105:
POTE generator: ~12/11 = 139.867
POTE generator: ~12/11 = 139.867


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 8, 26, 34, 60 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8, 26, 34, 60 }}


Badness: 0.044253
Badness: 0.044253
Line 118: Line 118:
POTE generator: ~12/11 = 139.868
POTE generator: ~12/11 = 139.868


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 8, 26, 34, 60 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8, 26, 34, 60 }}


Badness: 0.029429
Badness: 0.029429
Line 131: Line 131:
[[POTE generator]]: ~27/25 = 140.754
[[POTE generator]]: ~27/25 = 140.754


{{Val list|legend=1| 8d, 60, 68, 128 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8d, 60, 68, 128 }}


[[Badness]]: 0.114143
[[Badness]]: 0.114143
Line 144: Line 144:
POTE generator: ~27/25 = 140.771
POTE generator: ~27/25 = 140.771


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 8de, 60, 68, 128, 196 }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8de, 60, 68, 128, 196 }}


Badness: 0.120165
Badness: 0.120165
Line 157: Line 157:
POTE generator: ~13/12 = 140.760
POTE generator: ~13/12 = 140.760


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 8de, 60, 68, 128, 196f }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8de, 60, 68, 128, 196f }}


Badness: 0.067365
Badness: 0.067365
Line 170: Line 170:
POTE generator: ~27/25 = 140.630
POTE generator: ~27/25 = 140.630


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 8d, 60e, 68, 128e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8d, 60e, 68, 128e }}


Badness: 0.057268
Badness: 0.057268
Line 183: Line 183:
POTE generator: ~13/12 = 140.728
POTE generator: ~13/12 = 140.728


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 8d, 60e, 68, 128e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8d, 60e, 68, 128e }}


Badness: 0.036128
Badness: 0.036128
Line 196: Line 196:
POTE generator: ~13/12 = 140.718
POTE generator: ~13/12 = 140.718


Optimal GPV sequence: {{Val list| 8d, 60e, 68, 128e }}
{{Optimal ET sequence|legend=1| 8d, 60e, 68, 128e }}


Badness: 0.024796
Badness: 0.024796