User talk:CompactStar/Ed8/5: Difference between revisions
Reply |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::: Okay. I don't see any problem with merging the interval pages with ET pages, and the quality of stubs like [[8/3]] would be improved when merging them with [[Ed8/3]] anyways. Although, I suggest [[EDF]] should also be kept as-is due to being explored a lot like EDO and EDT. [[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 02:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC) | ::: Okay. I don't see any problem with merging the interval pages with ET pages, and the quality of stubs like [[8/3]] would be improved when merging them with [[Ed8/3]] anyways. Although, I suggest [[EDF]] should also be kept as-is due to being explored a lot like EDO and EDT. [[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 02:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::: Indeed, I forgot to mention EDF but I would also include in along with EDO and EDT as the main ones. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 04:08, 15 March 2023 (UTC) | :::: Indeed, I forgot to mention EDF but I would also include in along with EDO and EDT as the main ones. --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 04:08, 15 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
:::: I just thought of a reason to keep these pages around. All pages about equal divisions of the same interval are placed together in a category (e.g. [[:Category:Ed5/2]]), so it allows for pages like this one to be the category's main page. I do think, however, that some pages needlessly repeat some information that could be referenced instead (e.g. "the question of equivalence", could link to [[interval of equivalence]] where this is already discussed). --[[User:Fredg999|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999|talk]]) 04:12, 17 March 2023 (UTC) | |||