Talk:Arithmetic tuning: Difference between revisions
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
re |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
: EFD was never "reserved" for irrational. It should support either irrational or rational. If that’s not clear in an article, please feel free to correct it or point it out to me. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 16:34, 3 March 2023 (UTC) | : EFD was never "reserved" for irrational. It should support either irrational or rational. If that’s not clear in an article, please feel free to correct it or point it out to me. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 16:34, 3 March 2023 (UTC) | ||
:: Well, that again narrows down to how we use the term ''arithmetic''. Just as I expected, there are [[Wikipedia: Geometric progression|geometric progression]] and [[Wikipedia: Harmonic progression|harmonic progression]] besides arithmetic progression aka sequence. I don't find it very cool to only take arithmetic progression without also taking geometric progression – adapted as ''equal'' here, and harmonic progression – adapted as ''inverse-arithmetic'' here. | |||
:: I guess you have a fair point at least for an alias of those unity divisions. But still, I believe identifiers like "12odo" should be discouraged due to lack of orthogonality. It's either 12ado aka 12efdo or mode 12. | |||
:: [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 18:49, 3 March 2023 (UTC) | |||