TIFE comma: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Fredg999 category edits (talk | contribs)
Line 5: Line 5:
== Properties ==
== Properties ==


A subgroup comma may or may not be a tife depending on the choice of the [[basis]] of the subgroup. For example, [[81/80]] is a tife in the subgroup 2.3.5 when using the basis {2, 3, 5}, because 81/80 = 2<sup>−4</sup> · 3<sup>4</sup> · 5<sup>−1</sup>, but not when using the basis {2, 3/2, 5}, because 81/80 = 2<sup>0</sup> · (3/2)<sup>4</sup> · 5<sup>−1</sup> and at least of the exponents in that expression is 0.
A subgroup comma may or may not be a tife depending on the choice of the [[basis]] of the subgroup. For example, [[81/80]] is a tife in the subgroup 2.3.5 when using the basis {2, 3, 5}, because 81/80 = 2<sup>−4</sup> · 3<sup>4</sup> · 5<sup>−1</sup>, but not when using the basis {2, 3/2, 5}, because 81/80 = 2<sup>0</sup> · (3/2)<sup>4</sup> · 5<sup>−1</sup> and at least one  of the exponents in that expression is 0.


== See also ==
== See also ==

Revision as of 02:04, 19 January 2023

A target-list-inclusive fully dimensionally entangled comma (TIFE comma or tife) is a subgroup comma that grabs every subgroup dimension at the same time, for whatever subgroup one is working on or looking at.[1]

The term was coined by Scott Dakota.[1]

Properties

A subgroup comma may or may not be a tife depending on the choice of the basis of the subgroup. For example, 81/80 is a tife in the subgroup 2.3.5 when using the basis {2, 3, 5}, because 81/80 = 2−4 · 34 · 5−1, but not when using the basis {2, 3/2, 5}, because 81/80 = 20 · (3/2)4 · 5−1 and at least one of the exponents in that expression is 0.

See also

References