Talk:Vals and tuning space: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Cmloegcmluin (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
"Note that the TE norm for this val is approximately 31." I don't understand what this sentence is trying to tell me about this fact. Is it a coincidence? What is the significance? Is this unexpected, or unusual? --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:12, 29 June 2021 (UTC) | "Note that the TE norm for this val is approximately 31." I don't understand what this sentence is trying to tell me about this fact. Is it a coincidence? What is the significance? Is this unexpected, or unusual? --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 22:12, 29 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
: Any "good" (meaning: it tries to approximate the JI) val is expected to have the TE norm [complexity] close to its division of the octave. It is the complexity of the temperament and can be used to compute the TE relative error. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:21, 30 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:21, 30 June 2021
|
This page also contains archived Wikispaces discussion. |
Meaning of last sentence
"Note that the TE norm for this val is approximately 31." I don't understand what this sentence is trying to tell me about this fact. Is it a coincidence? What is the significance? Is this unexpected, or unusual? --Cmloegcmluin (talk) 22:12, 29 June 2021 (UTC)