User talk:Userminusone/Goldis comma: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::: I see what you're saying. I guess the negri comma, goldis comma, and porcupine comma could all be interpreted as similar but different 5 limit quarter tones. By the way, I just found out that [[89edo]] tempers out the quartisma and the goldis comma, which is a bizarre but cool bridge between your work and my work. --[[User:Userminusone|Userminusone]] ([[User talk:Userminusone|talk]]) 02:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC) | ::: I see what you're saying. I guess the negri comma, goldis comma, and porcupine comma could all be interpreted as similar but different 5 limit quarter tones. By the way, I just found out that [[89edo]] tempers out the quartisma and the goldis comma, which is a bizarre but cool bridge between your work and my work. --[[User:Userminusone|Userminusone]] ([[User talk:Userminusone|talk]]) 02:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC) | ||
:::: For the record, three instances of 250/243 plus one instance of 129140163/125000000 also adds up to 9/8. Oh, and yeah, 89edo is definitely an interesting bridge between your work and mine. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC) | :::: Yep. For the record, three instances of 250/243 plus one instance of 129140163/125000000 also adds up to 9/8. Oh, and yeah, 89edo is definitely an interesting bridge between your work and mine. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 02:50, 19 March 2021 (UTC) |