19edo: Difference between revisions

Wikispaces>xenwolf
**Imported revision 36226755 - Original comment: +1 external link**
Wikispaces>xenwolf
**Imported revision 36226907 - Original comment: link to equal table**
Line 1: Line 1:
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
<h2>IMPORTED REVISION FROM WIKISPACES</h2>
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
This is an imported revision from Wikispaces. The revision metadata is included below for reference:<br>
: This revision was by author [[User:xenwolf|xenwolf]] and made on <tt>2008-08-27 17:40:45 UTC</tt>.<br>
: This revision was by author [[User:xenwolf|xenwolf]] and made on <tt>2008-08-27 17:42:38 UTC</tt>.<br>
: The original revision id was <tt>36226755</tt>.<br>
: The original revision id was <tt>36226907</tt>.<br>
: The revision comment was: <tt>+1 external link</tt><br>
: The revision comment was: <tt>link to equal table</tt><br>
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
The revision contents are below, presented both in the original Wikispaces Wikitext format, and in HTML exactly as Wikispaces rendered it.<br>
<h4>Original Wikitext content:</h4>
<h4>Original Wikitext content:</h4>
Line 12: Line 12:
=Theory=  
=Theory=  


In music, **19 equal temperament**, called 19-TET, 19-EDO, or 19-ET, is the scale derived by dividing the octave into 19 equally large steps. Each step represents a frequency ratio of the 19th root of 2, or 63.16 cents.
In music, **19 equal temperament**, called 19-TET, 19-EDO, or 19-ET, is the scale derived by dividing the octave into 19 [[equal]]ly large steps. Each step represents a frequency ratio of the 19th root of 2, or 63.16 cents.


Interest in this tuning system goes back to the sixteenth century, when composer Guillaume Costeley used it in his chanson //Seigneur Dieu ta pitié// of 1558. Costeley understood and desired the circulating aspect of this tuning; in 1577 music theorist Francisco de Salinas in effect proposed it. Salinas discussed 1/3-comma meantone, in which the fifth is of size 694.786 cents; the fifth of 19-et is 694.737, which is only a twentieth of a cent flatter. Salinas suggested tuning nineteen tones to the octave to this tuning, which fails to close by less than a cent, so that his suggestion is effectively 19-et. In the nineteenth century mathematician and music theorist Wesley Woolhouse proposed it as a more practical alternative to meantone tunings he regarded as better, such as [[50edo|50 equal temperament]] ([[http://sonic-arts.org/monzo/woolhouse/essay.htm|summary of Woolhouse's essay]]).
Interest in this tuning system goes back to the sixteenth century, when composer Guillaume Costeley used it in his chanson //Seigneur Dieu ta pitié// of 1558. Costeley understood and desired the circulating aspect of this tuning; in 1577 music theorist Francisco de Salinas in effect proposed it. Salinas discussed 1/3-comma meantone, in which the fifth is of size 694.786 cents; the fifth of 19-et is 694.737, which is only a twentieth of a cent flatter. Salinas suggested tuning nineteen tones to the octave to this tuning, which fails to close by less than a cent, so that his suggestion is effectively 19-et. In the nineteenth century mathematician and music theorist Wesley Woolhouse proposed it as a more practical alternative to meantone tunings he regarded as better, such as [[50edo|50 equal temperament]] ([[http://sonic-arts.org/monzo/woolhouse/essay.htm|summary of Woolhouse's essay]]).
Line 58: Line 58:
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:&amp;lt;h1&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h1 id="toc0"&gt;&lt;a name="Theory"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:0 --&gt;Theory&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;!-- ws:start:WikiTextHeadingRule:0:&amp;lt;h1&amp;gt; --&gt;&lt;h1 id="toc0"&gt;&lt;a name="Theory"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- ws:end:WikiTextHeadingRule:0 --&gt;Theory&lt;/h1&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
In music, &lt;strong&gt;19 equal temperament&lt;/strong&gt;, called 19-TET, 19-EDO, or 19-ET, is the scale derived by dividing the octave into 19 equally large steps. Each step represents a frequency ratio of the 19th root of 2, or 63.16 cents.&lt;br /&gt;
In music, &lt;strong&gt;19 equal temperament&lt;/strong&gt;, called 19-TET, 19-EDO, or 19-ET, is the scale derived by dividing the octave into 19 &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/equal"&gt;equal&lt;/a&gt;ly large steps. Each step represents a frequency ratio of the 19th root of 2, or 63.16 cents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interest in this tuning system goes back to the sixteenth century, when composer Guillaume Costeley used it in his chanson &lt;em&gt;Seigneur Dieu ta pitié&lt;/em&gt; of 1558. Costeley understood and desired the circulating aspect of this tuning; in 1577 music theorist Francisco de Salinas in effect proposed it. Salinas discussed 1/3-comma meantone, in which the fifth is of size 694.786 cents; the fifth of 19-et is 694.737, which is only a twentieth of a cent flatter. Salinas suggested tuning nineteen tones to the octave to this tuning, which fails to close by less than a cent, so that his suggestion is effectively 19-et. In the nineteenth century mathematician and music theorist Wesley Woolhouse proposed it as a more practical alternative to meantone tunings he regarded as better, such as &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/50edo"&gt;50 equal temperament&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://sonic-arts.org/monzo/woolhouse/essay.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;summary of Woolhouse's essay&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br /&gt;
Interest in this tuning system goes back to the sixteenth century, when composer Guillaume Costeley used it in his chanson &lt;em&gt;Seigneur Dieu ta pitié&lt;/em&gt; of 1558. Costeley understood and desired the circulating aspect of this tuning; in 1577 music theorist Francisco de Salinas in effect proposed it. Salinas discussed 1/3-comma meantone, in which the fifth is of size 694.786 cents; the fifth of 19-et is 694.737, which is only a twentieth of a cent flatter. Salinas suggested tuning nineteen tones to the octave to this tuning, which fails to close by less than a cent, so that his suggestion is effectively 19-et. In the nineteenth century mathematician and music theorist Wesley Woolhouse proposed it as a more practical alternative to meantone tunings he regarded as better, such as &lt;a class="wiki_link" href="/50edo"&gt;50 equal temperament&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a class="wiki_link_ext" href="http://sonic-arts.org/monzo/woolhouse/essay.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;summary of Woolhouse's essay&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;br /&gt;