User talk:FloraC/Sandbox: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: Instead of adding/discussing isolated CSS features, let's have a look at ''[[Wikipedia: Musical tuning #Further reading]]''. Would you agree that we should aim for a design that is roughly equivalent to what Wikipedia has to offer? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 17:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC) | :: Instead of adding/discussing isolated CSS features, let's have a look at ''[[Wikipedia: Musical tuning #Further reading]]''. Would you agree that we should aim for a design that is roughly equivalent to what Wikipedia has to offer? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 17:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
::: Just roughly. To my eyes the current design works okay, and if it's to be improved, I'm not fond of the colored background against the text. Anyway, I'll try making a template for this. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 18:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:15, 28 January 2021
Collapsible elements
I find it not optimal to have expand links displayed without visual connection to the text (standing lonely in the nowhere). What about adding some border (maybe background as well) to the collapsible/expandable divs? --Xenwolf (talk) 17:29, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
- Instead of adding/discussing isolated CSS features, let's have a look at Wikipedia: Musical tuning #Further reading. Would you agree that we should aim for a design that is roughly equivalent to what Wikipedia has to offer? --Xenwolf (talk) 17:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)