Talk:33/25: Difference between revisions

From Xenharmonic Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Xenwolf (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, confirmaccount-notify, Interface administrators, Sysops
8,705 edits
m →128/99: better heading
Aura (talk | contribs)
autopatrolled, emailconfirmed
6,010 edits
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


::: As can be seen on [[Gallery of just intervals]], "unedecimal forth" isn't already taken. So I'd suggest to remove the ''sub'' prefix here. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:28, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
::: As can be seen on [[Gallery of just intervals]], "unedecimal forth" isn't already taken. So I'd suggest to remove the ''sub'' prefix here. --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 21:28, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
:::: Right then. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 21:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:54, 17 December 2020

Relation to 128/99

Okay, we need to work out how to distinguish this interval from 128/99 in terms of nomenclature. --Aura (talk) 21:02, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

You mean both (33/25 and 128/99) are undecimal fourths? But the other is much more a subfourth ... --Xenwolf (talk) 21:17, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
It is indeed the case that 128/99 is more of a subfourth. However, if you look in the infobox for 33/25, you will see that 33/25 is dubbed the "undecimal sub-fourth". Therefore, the name in the infobox for 33/25 ought to be changed. --Aura (talk) 21:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
As can be seen on Gallery of just intervals, "unedecimal forth" isn't already taken. So I'd suggest to remove the sub prefix here. --Xenwolf (talk) 21:28, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Right then. --Aura (talk) 21:54, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:33/25&oldid=56873"